Showing posts with label Human. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human. Show all posts

Friday, July 1, 2011

You Cannot Automate Everything with Computers to Run Human Society and Still Maintain Freedom

As the coordinator for a think tank which happens to operate online, I often find people who are computer savvy, and have skills in the IT sector. They definitely come up with very intriguing ideas to streamline our civilization using software and computers to help improve the efficiency. However, there is a problem with all this, and that is that the folks writing the software, and creating the hardware, perhaps do not have the proper experience in a given industry, or understand the ramifications or law of unintended consequences when proposing ways to fix the economy, government, healthcare system, transportation, or anything else.

Perhaps you've been frustrated when you were forced to fill out a form online or on a computer. You weren't allowed to go to the next question until filled out something in the previous box. Unfortunately what you had to fill out in the box was unacceptable, there were no good choices, or you couldn't answer the question because it wasn't applicable. It's times like that that you realize that the computer systems were set up for a certain type of scenario, rather than someone who has a special case, special need, or a different situation.

One thing I've learned is if you try to develop a system for the most unintelligent person, and make it simple enough for everyone to use, you inevitably run into problems if there are complications. It happens anytime you make a rule, regulation, or law and making rules is pretty much that's what writing software is about. You see, you cannot automate everything with computers to run human civilization and society. And if you try you will inadvertently take away freedom. In other words someone won't be allowed to do something merely because there was a box to fill out, or a form, and therefore they can't.

That's unfortunate because we have laws in our country which are supposed to be set up that; "if it doesn't say you can't, then you automatically can," and in a way by making few rules, we derive freedom while living under the rule of law. Now then, the software programmers and the hardware that runs these computers will not be able to think of everything on their own, until we create true artificially intelligent to run the system and make future changes on its own.

Meanwhile humans who are fallible, and in this case may not understand all the future situations because things change, but also because they have no experience in that particular industry, area of endeavor, or social program, are causing a loss of freedom with each new rule they create to run the new system.

We must be very careful what we automate things not to cut people out of the pattern, or take away the freedoms that we all love. We do this far too often when someone doesn't consider all the potential eventualities in advance, and they come up with some law, rule, or software program which alienates an entire group of people. Or, sometimes just an individual, someone like you. I hope I've made my point.

Lance Winslow is the Founder of the Online Think Tank, a diverse group of achievers, experts, innovators, entrepreneurs, thinkers, futurists, academics, dreamers, leaders, and general all around brilliant minds. Lance Winslow hopes you've enjoyed today's discussion and topic. http://www.worldthinktank.net/ - Have an important subject to discuss, contact Lance Winslow.


View the original article here

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Is There Really Free-Will and Can Human Psychologists One Day Predict Human Behavior?

Is it possible that someday a supercomputer can predict all of your choices that you will make from the time you are born until the time you die based on your genetic code and DNA? And if so how close can they actually get, and how much random chance will shake up that prediction. Is it impossible to know - or is it possible that someone's entire life could be foretold? And with that said if you can predict the life of one individual, could you indeed predict the life of 7 billion humans on the planet?

That is to say predict how they will interact, and all the events that could possibly occur? Theoretically, and here is where we get into a bit of philosophy, the answer is probably yes. Now that's certainly going to bother a good number of people who believe in free will, and it bothers me even bringing up the topic. You see I believe in freedom and liberty, and I intend to live my life as if I am free. But am I? Are you?

It might sound a bit cliche'ish to invoke the example of the Hollywood Movie "Minority Report" as it seems someone always is, but indeed, it was a very decent movie with an on-going moral dilemma of free-will versus a Calvanistic view of the world. Nevertheless, last week I was having an interesting dialogue with an overseas acquaintance about the ability of modern day psychologists predicting future behavior.

We do it all the time in our society, we call it profiling. We do it at our airports, and our State Department, Military, CIA, etc, does it in sizing up those individuals we must deal with. It seems quite possible that our ability to predict the weather is getting much better with supercomputers, so indeed at sometime in the future we should be able to predict human behavior, and human choices based on the individual in certain circumstances. And we should be up to do this somewhere within the 99.99 percentile.

Does that mean we should?

After all, there could be some serious benefits if we can predict such things, and we would be able to prevent terrorism, and violent acts. We could use this to protect the American people, and prevent or reduce crime. However if we do this, what will we give up? Will we give up our freedom and liberty in the process? Will we dismiss free will as an underlining principle which guides our system of laws and society?

Yes, this is all just philosophy, but in the end we will have choices to make as our artificially intelligent supercomputer systems become more robust and our understanding of algorithmic prediction and mathematical proximity reaches that ultimate plateau. Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it. If you'd like discussing such matters then please shoot me an e-mail, my line is always open.

Lance Winslow is the Founder of the Online Think Tank, a diverse group of achievers, experts, innovators, entrepreneurs, thinkers, futurists, academics, dreamers, leaders, and general all around brilliant minds. Lance Winslow hopes you've enjoyed today's discussion and topic. http://www.worldthinktank.net/ - Have an important subject to discuss, contact Lance Winslow.


View the original article here

Monday, June 27, 2011

The Next Generation of Human Nature and Civilization

The traditional American philosophy is characterized by the concept of natural law and the rule of law, etc. That our social and political laws should reflect the natural laws of human nature. They're based on the premise that self interest and competition are inherent attributes of human nature.

Our social and governmental systems are designed to channel these natural aspects of human nature into a more perfect union. It is designed with three main branches of government that are equal, so they could compete with each other and prevent any one branch from becoming oppressive.

At the same time the US government was being formed, Adam Smith published his famous book, The Wealth of Nations. I haven't read that book, but I understand that it proposes that this philosophy of self interest and competition are natural and healthy. This post modern philosophy, that everything is subjective and self oriented was very popular at that time.

I believe that the Enlightenment philosophy of realism and essentialism are an accurate understanding of human nature and reality. Objective reality exists completely independent of anyone's perception of it. I also agree with the existential principles of personal responsibility, self determination and free enterprise. They're inherent attributes of human nature, that exist in harmony with an ecosystem that includes limitations upon the expression of that creative freedom inherent in human nature.

The American Revolution was a giant leap forward, relative to the rule of man, the aristocracy, nobility and feudalism that it revolutionized. The evidence of that is the dramatic transformation of the social and economic development of human civilization that has occurred since the American Revolution.

Then, in response to the World Wars of the 20th century, the United Nations and the Bretton Woods banking system was set up. The UN is based on the premise that human beings are cooperative, and strives to establish peace and justice for all people everywhere, with special emphasis on protecting the poorest, most disadvantaged of earth's citizens.

The Bretton Woods banking system, setting up the World Bank and the IMF, etc., is based on the US dollar. It is now essentially bankrupt. The United Nations has recovered from the devastation of World War 2 and the wealth is distributed much more widely.

World business and government leaders are currently consulting, at the United Nations, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the World Economic Forum, etc., about how to replace that unipolar Bretton Woods system, with a more global social and economic development framework, and to achieve that transition as peacefully as possible.

The philosophical, social and economic development progress that we've made, between the American Revolution and the founding of the United Nations, is again dramatic. It is another giant leap forward in our understanding of human nature and civilization.

Human civilization is whatever we, the people of earth, make it. We are free agents, who are responsible and accountable for own actions. Civilized human human beings cooperate with each other based on the rule of law, rather than compete with each other for food and shelter like wild animals and that whole Darwinian struggle for survival of the fittest.

Of course, we do have those natural instincts that we've inherited from our animal heritage. However, we also have the rule of law, first revealed in our world's religions and then reflected in the social and economic development of human nature and civilization.

The entire human race is one universal common wealth. The United Nations is our global federation of nations. I am very patriotic about the USA. I've studied its history and philosophy extensively, and consider the USA to be one of the greatest founding members of the United Nations. The American nation and people have done more to advance the cause of human rights than any other nation or people in history.

I just feel like the United Nations philosophy is superior to the USA philosophy, just like the USA philosophy is superior to the feudalism that it replaced. Teaching the American people the value of peace and cooperation with our global community is important and difficult. It is important because in order to have world peace, the American people have to agree to participate in our world community in a peaceful and respectful way.

It is going to be difficult because of the traditional American values, which are good values, of independence, self interest and competition are so ingrained in our American consciousness. Other nations are going to have to go through the same difficult process of giving up that tribal attitude of superiority. The rest of the world will not accept American hegemony, and rightly so. We're not going to accept China being the Middle Kingdom either.

We're all going to have to give up our provincial, tribal, racial and national sense of superiority. We can and will live in peace and harmony with each other and our natural habitat. We're making tremendous progress. The whole world economy is booming. There is more wealth and prosperity, more widespread now, than ever before in the history of earth.

And we have a lot of progress to make. That's why it is so important to educate the American people, and the world's people, to unite. Unite the clans! Let us get together into this universal common wealth that our ancestors have created, and make it work. Let's create a more perfect union, that includes all human beings everywhere.

By Bob Mccoy
Experience the expansion of human consciousness, onto our global network of satellite and fiber optical communications, our cloud of on demand computer services, our world wide knowledge management system. Investigate http://www.holistic-home-office.com/ and discover an ancient way to earn a living; adapted to our modern, universal common wealth.


View the original article here

Plato, Carbon and the Human Survival Chemistry of the New Renaissance

The world of nanotechnology demonstrates that the ancient Greek Science for Ethical Ends holds a crucial survival message for modern humanity. 21st Century Moral Jurisprudence Law, based upon Immanuel Kant's definition of aesthetics, as art appreciation theory, has no present practical scientific ethical content. However, aesthetics and ethics link together, through a process known as quantum entanglement, where they function together within the world of quantum nano biotechnology. Aristotle's harmonic ethical knowledge to guide a science about ennobling government, for the health of the universe, has been given practical validation with the discovery of a new rigorous chemistry embracing the ancient ethical science.

Historically, when a lack of ethics caused one state to threaten another, order from chaos in the form of a disciplined command structure for defense, meant the difference between enslavement or prosperity. A systematic use of natural resources, relying upon a control of state economic wealth, both for the purpose of aggression and defence occurred. Religious and political appeals to aesthetic emotions, about pride, honour, glory or sacrifice, were fused into daily conduct, to instil a common purpose for both aggression and defence. Today, a more real process of obtaining order from chaos is about aesthetics linking with the process of ethical creative thought, through quantum entanglement, to produce a new medical nanotechnology science to guide ennobling global government.

The scientific research by the 18th Century logician Immanuel Kant and its relevance to our understanding of ethics, is now seen as a crucial issue for the survival of civilisation. This crucial discovery belongs to the fractal logic now upholding the quantum biological chemistry of the New Florentine Renaissance Project.

The Project's directors, Professor Paolo Manzelli and Professor Massimo Pregnolato, awarded the Georgio Napolitano Medal on behalf of the Republic of Italy for establishing the quantum biology chemistry of the New Renaissance, now have dramatic evidence from the Humanities about the global importance of their work. The growing influential international mindset of such organisations as the Telesio- Galilei Academy of Science, London, has recognised the importance of the New Florentine Renaissance. By breaking free from the yoke of the 20th Century entropic world-view, the Academy's vast range of scientific and academic scholars is able to appreciate the vital association between the new Renaissance chemistry and the Florentine New Measurement of Humanity Project.

The three 1996 Nobel Laureates had used the logic of the engineer Buckminster Fuller to establish their Fullerene Chemistry as a base for their medical life science institute called C Sixty Inc. Harvard University's Novartis Professor Amy Edmondson, internationally known for her contributions to aesthetic reasoning within the corporate sector, had published that Buckminster Fuller had derived his crucial synergistic energy concepts from the mathematical writings of the Greek philosopher Plato. Accordingly, the Science-Art Centre in Australia, renamed the chemistry as Platonic-Fullerene Chemistry. This was to help the public to feel better equipped to understand about the new rebirth of the lost Classical Greek life-science, The Science for Ethical Ends.

From the perspective of this new chemistry, the morality, aesthetics and ethics that the philosopher Immanuel Kant associated with law, politics and society is more easily explainable. We can remember, that during the 18th Century, people were beginning to associate electricity with spiritual reality. We can imagine the mindset of Immanuel Kant, the scientist, who held that ethics was about an infinite God-like evolution of consciousness based upon electromagnetic principles. There is a direct link between Kant's work and Buckmister Fuller's synergistic science of life principles. Fuller derived his work from Plato's mathematics about ethical spiritual godlike optical engineering principles. The new rigorous medical chemistry can guide us politically toward the discovery of new futuristic technologies to ensure the betterment of the global human condition. The sooner this human survival ethic bears the approval of International Red Cross, the better.

The public is becoming aware of a vast confusion of legal opinion associated with modern global economic rationalism. The earth's environment is being polluted and serious threats to the health and well-being of the global community are occurring, seemingly without practical solutions. Because of the new Platonic-Fullerene Chemistry, it is reasonable to re-examine the ethics associated with Hans Christian Oersted's discovery of electromagnetism linked with Kant's philosophy of science, as outlined in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science of 1786. We can now successfully change the various relevant research methodologies used up until the present time, where Kant's Aesthetics, the theory of art appreciation, came to influence today's inadequate moral and ethical jurisprudence policies of corporations and governments.

The new rigorous Platonic-Fullerene Chemistry is consistent with the discovery last century of Sir Isaac Newton's unpublished Heresy Papers, in which Newton expressed his certain conviction that the mechanical description of the universe is balanced by a natural, more profound philosophy, based upon the same physics principles that upheld both Plato and Fuller's ethical world-views. This was given credence when the NASA Astrophysics High Energy Division Library, published argument that the Classical Greek life-science world-view is based upon infinite fractal harmonic geometrical logic. Such logic is in complete contradiction to the entropic logic upholding global economic rationalism. Newton's unpublished papers can no longer be classified as belonging to a criminally insane mind, brought about by breathing mercurial fumes within his alchemy laboratory.

We can see immediately why Kant's Aesthetics, art appreciation theory, was incorrectly used within the global corporate sector to construct endless complex policies to guide fair business models to optimize perpetual commercial activity, in the mistaken belief that they were serving the interests of global society. Kant's ethics were based upon the concept that they belonged to the infinite evolution of a God-like consciousness, leading to the concept of Perpetual Peace on earth. The only logic that can accommodate such a concept belongs to infinite fractal geometrical logic, but that concept is simply not permissible within present entropic global economic rationalism.

Global economic rationalism, being totally governed by the logic upholding the 20th Century's unbalanced entropic chemistry, automatically forbids such ethics to exist. The governing law of universal entropy demands the eventual extinction of all life in the universe and therefore, accepted modern life-sciences can only be about species moving toward extinction. This superstitious religious Dark Age mentality prevails in the face of the 21st Century discovery of Platonic-Fullerene quantum biological chemistry. In general, the Perpetual Peace belonging to the holographic engineering principles of the Science for Ethical Ends cannot even be the subject of transparent critical debate within our universities. Meanwhile, the unbalanced Aesthetic Jurisprudence governing global economic rationalism can only accelerate the prime destructive directive of our entropic physics and chemistry.

Kant's Aesthetics is defined as the theory of art appreciation. A beautiful painting of majestic waterfalls, represents seeing beauty within the process of materialistic decay. Kant's ethics were about Plato's spiritual optics associated with evolving consciousness. By using special 3-D glasses we can see that some artists over the centuries unconsciously depicted fractal logic holographic images within their paintings. Kant had been forbidden by Church authorities to allude to that now proven evolving optical sense perception. Such optical evidence can readily be linked to the discovery of the Molecule of Emotion in 1972 by Dr Candace Pert. That molecule evolves by the process of increasing the speed of its molecular movement, a principle of physics belonging to Sir Isaac Newton's heretical, but balanced world-view and also much earlier in history, to the Platonic Science for Ethical Ends.

A difference between aesthetics and ethics in terms of an understanding of the second law of thermodynamics, which forbids infinite electromagnetic life-science ethics to exist, became evident in the early 20th Century. Maria Montessori is listed in TIME Magazine's Century of Science, as the greatest scientist of 1907. Her research into how electromagnetism influenced evolutionary creativity in young children was critical of Einstein's understanding of the second law of thermodynamics, by referring to it as the greed energy law.

Montessori's colleague, Tielhard de Chardin, argued that their electromagnetic Golden Gates to the future could only open for all people at the same time and not for any chosen race or privileged few. In direct contrast, her financial supporters, Graham Alexander Bell and President Woodrow Wilson, used Charles Darwin's life-science, based upon the second law of thermodynamics, to guide the American Darwinian Eugenics political program. During the 1930s, many states in the U.S. had eugenics laws, with those in California being used as a base for eugenics legislation under the dictatorship of Adolph Hitler. Ethics certainly cannot exist within an entropic Nazi culture, nor can it exist within the culture of entropic global economic rationalism.

The six essays compiled through 1976 to 1994,by the Max Planck Institute's Astrophysicist Peter Kafka, entitled The Principle of Creation and the Global Acceleration Crisis, predicted the 21st Century global economic collapse. Professor Kafka referred to the second law as being a diabolical worship of the ancient god of chaos, Diabolos. In the last paragraph, Kafka writes that when the situation becomes too ugly and becomes unbearable, people will understand that strange attractors are near.

Beautiful attractors belong to the fractal thought processes providing aesthetic emotional response to beauty within the world of material entropic decay. Strange attractors function within the quantum entanglement process, where aesthetic emotion allows for cerebral electromagnetic pattern recognition to provide rational ethical knowledge belonging to the Platonic Science for Ethical Ends. This evolving life-science wisdom was Sir Isaac Newton's more profound natural philosophy to balance entropic decay. His linking of evolutionary information carried by light in association with gravity, is now relevant to quantum biology.

The search for new technologies associated with the balancing of entropic chemistry with the Platonic-Fullerene chemistry is generating a vast melting pot of new ideas to help toward establishing a sustainable future for global humanity. The extent of such ideas promotes an optimism that the grave problems threatening humanity can be surmounted by linking the two chemistries to embrace both the material and the holographic (spiritual) environment. From these ideas it becomes clear that an inadequate and ignorant political understanding about the role that carbon plays in the living process is now endangering global human survival. Global climate change, as a life science, cannot be linked to the infinite fractal logic functioning of a rain-cloud, because Einstein's understanding of the second law of thermodynamics, as the Premier law of all of science, being finite, prohibits it.

The properties of light passing through the liquid crystal construction of the cellular membrane into Buckminster Fullerene carbon nanotubes, to constantly enfold protein patterning in the DNAin order to to fulfil an infinite universal fractal guidence, has been nano-photographed, but such evidence remains classified as a political no go zone within the floundering obsolete World educational system. This is because, evidence demonstrating a life-science association with Kant's ethics is automatically considered to be inconceivable within its linited world-view. For example, the Australian Government certainly exhibits genuine feelings of aesthetic compassion but owing to its entropic hostility, cannot link it to any practical ethical principles associated with the functioning of carbon within the new nanotechnology chemistry.

The issue of gaining a better understanding of the biological properties of Fullerene carbon is a crucial one. As the Australian Government teeters on the brink of collapse over its decision to impose a carbon tax, the public is beginning to realise that both it and the opposition are not at all conversant with the role that carbon actually plays within the now rapidly changing global environment. In Australia, university advisors on that subject, labouring within the confines of a totally entropic culture, have little knowledge about the new balancing Fullerene chemistry, let alone its rigorous physics association with the Platonic Science for Ethical Ends.

In 1984 the Science-Art Research Centre's Bio-Aestheticist, the late Dr George Robert Cockburn, Royal fellow of Medicine (London) published a book correcting Immanuel Kant's Aesthetics, entitled A Bio-Aesthetic Key to Creative Physics and Art. In 200, the Artist-author Christopher Degenhardt, published a Review of the book, revealing that Cockburn had reached the same conclusion that the 19th Century mathematician Bernard Bolzano made in his Theory of Science, when he also corrected Immanuel Kant's Aesthetics. Bolzano identified the infinite bio-properties of the strange attractor, which gives credence to Kant's concept that ethics was about an infinite evolution of consciousness, as was later proposed by the Nobel laureate in medicine, Svent- Gyoergyi.

Chris Degenhardt was presented with the Centre's 2009 Cockburn Memorial Award, for his discovery and later published essays about the new Florentine quantum biology chemistry's association with the properties of carbon activity functioning contrary to the entropic worldview. The April May 2011 issue of Cosmos Magazine quotes a statement by the journalist Rachel Ehrenberg, who refers to the bizarre world of carbon nanotubes. She writes "that they appear to break laws of physics, behave in ways chemistry can't explain and could be a new source of power".

The physicist, Dr Paul Taylor, recently returned from an exploration trip along the Amazon River, to research ancient biochar technolgy, organised with Dr Paul Widman, former Co- Chair of the United Nations University Millennium Project's Australasian Node, to hold a Black Carbon Research Workshop. This took place at the Science-Art Centre's Castle on The Hill in Australia, near Mt Warning in the Tweed Valley of New South Wales during April 2011. Paul Taylor, editor and co-author of the book The Biochar Revolution, with contributions from 18 Biochar experts and authors, spoke about the lost secret of the ancient Amazon Indian's Terra Pretta or Black Earth agricultural successes, described by the Spanish explorer Francisco de Orellana during the 16th Century. Paul Wildman, economics advisor to the Science-Art Centre, interested in the properties of black carbon nanotube biochar food supply objectives, spoke about the concept of Earth Jurisprudence, in which our economic system as well as our legal system must be reformed to protect basic human rights, in particular a guarantee of a ethically sustainable food supply.

The Director of the Sustainability Research Institute of Australia, the engineer Dudley Leggett, argued that the work of Alan Turing, who cracked Nazi Germany's Enigma code and has been recognised as the father of computer science, provided the basis for a better understanding of the value of biochar in agriculture. He pointed out that in 1952 Turing published The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis, describing how biological systems can self organise and showed that the wonders of creation are present in natural code form. Leggett explained that Turing had proposed that a complex balancing code existed in nature, acting beyond the limitations of entropic reality and that Turing's research methodology might be applied to break such a code for the benefit of the global human condition.

Dr Wildman, familiar with Aristotle's ethical medical-political science, argued, that it was impossible to obtain research funding about such ideas within the Australian entropic world-view. He proposed that an alternative hands-on endeavour, which he referred to as a 'Bush Mechanics' approach, should be employed. Working with one of the authors of the book The Biochar Revolution, Char Master Dolph Cooke, they had established a practical Biochar enterprise at Mebbin Springs in Northern New South Wales.

In conclusion, this essay attempts to stimulate scientific research within the Humanities, which embraces the great adventure of rigorous guidance from the Florentine quantum biology discoveries. Plato pointed out, that, without a sure knowledge of the engineering principles of spiritual (holographic) optics, all other engineering philosophies are barbaric and lead to warfare. To make matters even worse, the innate 'evil' associated with such an entropic philosophic culture was held to lead to the emergence of the destructive property of unformed matter from within the physical atom. Hence, Buckminster Fuller's warning in his book titled Utopia of Oblivion.

© Professor Robert Pope

http://www.science-art.com.au/

Professor Robert Pope is the Director of the Science-Art Research Centre of Australia, Uki, NSW, Australia. The Center's objective is to initiate a second Renaissance in science and art, so that the current science will be balanced by a more creative and feminine science. More information is available at the Science-Art Centre website: http://www.science-art.com.au/books.html

Professor Robert Pope is a recipient of the 2009 Gold Medal Laureate for Philosophy of Science, Telesio Galilei Academy of Science, London. He is an Ambassador for the Florentine New Measurement of Humanity Project, University of Florence, is listed in Marquis Who's Who of the World as an Artist-philosopher, and has received a Decree of Recognition from the American Council of the United Nations University Millennium Project, Australasian Node.

As a professional artist, he has held numerous university artist-in-residencies, including Adelaide University, University of Sydney, and the Dorothy Knox Fellowship for Distinguished Persons. His artwork has been featured of the front covers of the art encyclopedia, Artists and Galleries of Australia, Scientific Australian and the Australian Foreign Affairs Record. His artwork can be viewed on the Science-Art Centre's website.


View the original article here

Platonic-Fullerene Chemistry and the Ethics of Human Survival

People cannot be blamed for not understanding about any secret differences that exist between the meanings of eternal, infinite and perpetual. For thousands of years scholars have written complicated theories about that issue and many great thinkers were executed, imprisoned, or placed into exile for their efforts. Nonetheless, the matter has now become one of global human survival concern. Simple explanations, instead of complicated conspiracy speculations, are long overdue.

The molecule of emotion was discovered by Dr Candace Pert in 1972. Because of that discovery we can see why these secret differences have caused so much emotional chaos throughout history. The molecules evolve emotion by increasing the speed of their molecular movement. As well as evolving emotion, they also evolve the functioning of the endocrine system. This is essential for maintaining a healthy adaptation to a perpetual change of environmental reality. Platonic-Fullerene medical chemistry has now been rigorously established from the fractal logic of the ancient Greek Science for Ethical Ends. Based upon the physics principles of Sir Isaac Newton's unpublished Heresy Papers, the new chemistry reveals the electromagnetic difference between aesthetics and ethics. The former functions within an entropic quantum mechanical environment to produce cerebral recognition of evolving survival information through the process of quantum biological entanglement.

The molecular speeding up process can be shown to be obeying a property of fractal logic belonging to the functioning of an infinite universe. Accepted modern science realises that fractal logic can extend to infinity, but it is unable to associate that process with the living process. This is because the existing general understanding of the second law of thermodynamics, now governing all accepted science, holds that all life in the universe must be destroyed when the universe descends into a thermodynamic Armageddon. Under entropic law, it is just as impossible to make a perpetual motion machine as it is to make perpetual peace on earth. Newton's heresy was to balance mechanical decay with an evolving infinity, belonging to his infinite universe theories.

By revealing the secret confusion in society between concepts of eternity and infinity we become free from the merciless entropic yoke that has been imposed upon civilisation by entropic law.

The process of universal change is obvious, infinity becomes definable as perpetual change, while eternal religious lore imposes upon civilisation a fixed fictitious Armageddon of universal entropic death and destruction. Once again, science has been contaminated by the Church as it was when the earth was forbidden to revolve around the sun. All life sciences were forced to be only about a species moving toward total universal death and destruction for the religious objective of providing a fictitious redemption for an immortal soul deemed unfit for an infinite evolutionary purpose.

Scholars such as the 15th Century Nicholas of Cusa, tried to explain these matters about the Philosophy of the Infinite to the Vatican and developed profound mathematical theories about such matters, but he was later imprisoned and exiled for doing so. His work led on to the 18th Century electromagnetic theories of Immanuel Kant, of a God like perpetual peace on Earth. Kant's electromagnetic ethic was banished from science, while his Aesthetics art appreciation theory went on to become the basis of Western Moral Jurisprudence Law for perpetual economic growth to sustain civilisation.

The love of beauty can be considered part of the evolutionary process and its fractal logic functioning within the cerebral functioning is now understood in terms of quantum biology. The ancient Platonic concept of Wisdom Through Beauty is considered to be an electromagnetic phenomena. It is now morally essential that WesternMoral Jurisprudence Law be rewritten to accommodate Immanuel Kant's theories about perpetual peace. By modifying the existing moral law from its entropic disposition by exposing the secret social difference between eternal and infinite we might then be able to legally make sure that the world becomes a better, healthier place.

Professor Robert Pope ©

http://www.science-art.com.au/

Professor Robert Pope is the Director of the Science-Art Research Centre of Australia, Uki, NSW, Australia. The Center's objective is to initiate a second Renaissance in science and art, so that the current science will be balanced by a more creative and feminine science. More information is available at the Science-Art Centre website: http://www.science-art.com.au/books.html

Professor Robert Pope is a recipient of the 2009 Gold Medal Laureate for Philosophy of Science, Telesio Galilei Academy of Science, London. He is an Ambassador for the Florentine New Measurement of Humanity Project, University of Florence, is listed in Marquis Who's Who of the World as an Artist-philosopher, and has received a Decree of Recognition from the American Council of the United Nations University Millennium Project, Australasian Node.

As a professional artist, he has held numerous university artist-in-residencies, including Adelaide University, University of Sydney, and the Dorothy Knox Fellowship for Distinguished Persons. His artwork has been featured of the front covers of the art encyclopedia, Artists and Galleries of Australia, Scientific Australian and the Australian Foreign Affairs Record. His artwork can be viewed on the Science-Art Centre's website.


View the original article here