How To Be A Great Song And Dance Man Of History

When I say the words "song and dance," I do not mean performance, I mean what all honest philosophers, pundits, and people have been saying throughout history. It is a big song and dance in comparison with the reality of what people have been doing throughout said history of the world. What I mean is, reality does not line up with the song and dance routines that have been done throughout history for honesty, reality and reason. What I mean is Jesus, the Buddha, Mohammed, Lao Tzu, Confucious, Socrates, Aristotle, Augustine, Rand, Aquinas, Plato, Spinoza, Hegel, myself included and all the rest of them. We are all just song and dance men who say one thing about honesty and living better lives, but humanity practices another thing altogether in the form of wars, disagreements, dishonesty, and things just get worse and worse. Indeed, we all are just song and dance men until humanity can practice a better way. "Honesty" throughout history has been the right hand operator friend of "it does not work and is not realistic but it sounds good in theory, but due to certain shortcomings, it will not work in practice."

So, Bob Dylan in an interview, once said, "I am a song and dance man along with all the rest of them." With the paragraph above, I am delineating exactly what he meant by that statement. I mean the same thing. Why do I put this under "Arts and Entertainment: Philosophy," because this article is the ultimate song and dance, like Richard Gere playing the dancing lawyer in the movie version of "Chicago". We can all dance and be silly until we dance our way out of it, "it" meaning, the real meaning of reality, but we pay a great price for that. We pay by skipping over things we need to deal with.

So, I repeat, in my mind we are all just good sounding song and dance men until humanity can be evolved enough to put it all into practice. Sweat, sing and dance are the words that come to mind, like James Brown doing his dancing until everybody is in the heat of sweat and excitement entertained out of their troubles for a few minutes. Sure, I can dance around reality with the best of them, and sing a good song with the best of them. But ultimately it does all come down to how sane you are enough to sing and dance with us instead of sit in the audience and go, "Wow, he has got some song and dance routine. Is that for real?" I have to say that my song and dance is real, otherwise I would not be doing it and doing it consistently. So, am I just a song and dance man? No. But, until there is something better humanity can do than the great song and dance, that is what I am with every other conscious master. I am a big time song and dance man along with all the rest of them.

My name is Joshua Clayton, I am a freelance writer based in Inglewood, California. I also write under a few pen-names and aliases, but Joshua Clayton is my real name, and I write by that for the most part now. I am a philosophical writer and objective thinker and honest action taker. I also work at a senior center in Gardena, California as my day job, among other things, but primarily I am a writer.

View the original article here

Philosophy's Great Minds And Their Contribution To The Bible Story

Any study of ethics and ethos must include a visit into the world of philosophy. Briefly, we consider several philosophy contributors: Aristotle, Kant, Descartes, Augustine, Sartre, Spinoza, and Jesus Messiah. We limit our philosophical giants to this august group in consideration for time and space. The biblical Jesus, of course, receives inclusion: without whom this article would lack purpose.

Aristotle, the Peripatetic, advocated the syllogism as means to establish truth; which process prefers an input from major and minor premise and thus to an acceptable conclusion. Aristotle's syllogism was akin to theocratic ordinances requiring two witnesses for God ordinance infractions or to adjudicate theocratic rules resident in God ordinances. Such influence to God existence and theocratic rule over the twelve tribes cannot be denied. Thus, we establish a means to reliable conclusion.

Roughly quoted, Immanuel Kant observed: 'No man has the intellect to deny another man's God.' Astutely, he posited limitations to enquiry's broader scope as it might pertain to the intangible. Then, Descartes coined the renowned adage, "I think, therefore I am." The two observations not only reinforce each other but establish immutability in God existence in its basic legal-historicism (atheists take note); even so, such does not prove the omnipotence claimed (theists take note). However, such philosophical profoundness leads to yet another great insight.

Jean-Paul Sartre extended Descartes astute observation to existentialism dimensions. Sartre observed contemporaries exercising freedom of choice and therefore earning the burden for any fateful consequences: witnessed where ordinary men assume roles best suited to their own occasion or purpose; thus, we address existentialism's definition. Simply, existentialism defines man's tendency to innovate existence-to adopt self-determination. This self-reliance was the one fault preventing righteousness for the patriarchs in Hebrews 11, though they had abundant faith. Existentialism attains better definition in a more familiar example: where, Christians play a sympathetic role during fellowship but regress to a lesser role outside Church auspices. We might recall, self-determination was the downfall of Eve and Abraham's descendants, who sought Paul's 'better thing' advocated in Hebrews 11:40; which better thing awaited the 'Grace' opportunity posited at Romans 11:6.

We find then, these great philosophers did much to limit and define the language used for principals and principles in biblical subtlety.

At his own intellectuality expense, Saint Augustine noted an existential failing when he answered a friend's enquiry: "What is Grace? He answered: "I know what Grace is until you ask me; but when you ask me, I do not know." Such admission might prompt further enquiry: What uncertainty in Grace definition elicited pause from the renowned Saint Augustine? Such candor prompts enquiry into the non sequitur conclusions rampant in modernist exposition and sermon. To be sure, Bible language is difficult; and the cause for Augustine's incertitude magnifies the Romans 11:6 formula for attaining election status; we paraphrase Bible text: 'If by grace, then is attainment no more of works; otherwise grace is no more grace. But if attaining election be of works then is it no more grace; otherwise work is no more work.' We commiserate with St. Augustine's uncertainty! And you think Paul is easy to understand? Paul is saying: 'works and grace are incompatible'! Works cannot be the 'stars in your crown' nor is 'grace' the 'unmerited favor' so popularly envisioned.

Problematic, modern definition compromises the 'grace' extent in Romans 11:6; here, Grace is a 'time expression' and not tradition's mistaken 'material benefit.' Such misunderstanding evoked Messiah's displeasure at Mark 8:21 for his Disciples when they failed to understand the time, progeny, and Ages semantic in loaves, fishes, numbers fed, and baskets of fragments. Do exegetes know? Actually, time is the single most urgent Bible topic. How would you respond if present at the Mark 8:21 query? Would readers respond differently today?

We have a duty to extract Bible semantics, to transcend mediocrity, and to further interpretive excellence. However, excellence is rare. Spinoza convincingly summed it all up when he said, "Excellence is as rare as it is difficult." But we can and must seek excellence in whatever our endeavor. You can fall short of pure excellence, but any degree of excellence is superior to its opposite.

Schopenhouer gave would-be philosophers their due when he accredits Spinoza: 'To be a philosopher is to be a Spinoist.' If you strive for excellence, we invite your attention to further readings delving into the philosophy of religion. Truth is stranger than fiction - stranger than the misinterpretation still holding forth in traditional teachings.

Ben Winter, particles physicist, Bible scholar, and author of "THE GREAT DECEPTION: Symbols And Numbers Clarified," reveals there 'is' something new under the sun - that is, for modern Bible students. He addresses correctness of language and true intent of the major Bible topics: solves Bible mysteries, defines Gog and Magog, reveals Daniel He-goat's surprising identity, and dares to number the all important Ten Ages. Sign up for FREE book critiques at http://www.winterbriar.com/ and view more articles in blog format at http://blog.thegreatdeception.net/.

View the original article here